“Registrations for both our digital access and our Las Vegas event are continuing to show strong momentum, with thousands more registrations in the last few days,” the group said.Īfter going all virtual in 2021, CTA had planned CES 2022 as a hybrid event, with a digital component accompanying the in-person trade show and conference programming. In a statement to the Verge, the Consumer Technology Association pointed to the fact that it had only received 42 exhibitor cancellations thus far. (Protocol will be covering the show remotely as well.)įollowing those cancellations, CES organizers still put on a brave face. A large number of tech media outlets, including the Verge, CNET, Engadget and TechCrunch, also announced that they wouldn’t send any reporters to Las Vegas. IHeartMedia announced this week that it was canceling its popular CES party MediaLink pulled the plug on its CES events, which in prior years had been must-attend events for media insiders. Amazon, for instance, said that the company and its Ring subsidiary wold “no longer have an on-site presence at CES" due to "the quickly shifting situation and uncertainty around the omicron variant,” while TikTok simply pointed to “the increase in positive COVID-19 cases across the country.” Most of the companies pointed to health and safety concerns as the reason for pulling the plug. This follows similar announcements from AT&T, Amazon, Meta, Pinterest, TikTok, Twitter and others, as well as news that T-Mobile CEO Mike Sievert canceled his keynote speech, with the telco also announcing that “vast majority” of its team wouldn’t be attending in person. Intel announced Thursday that it would "move to a digital-first experience with minimal on-site staff," and Hisense reportedly switched its keynote from an in-person to a digital-only format.
![quantum event recorder red status quantum event recorder red status](https://keysight-h.assetsadobe.com/is/image/content/dam/keysight/en/img/soln/emerging-technologies/quantum-benchmark/deliver_homepage_img.jpg)
“If certain companies choose not to use Xinjiang products,” Zhao said, “it is their loss.” Spokesperson Zhao Lijian denied allegations about forced labor in Xinjiang at a Thursday press conference, and said they are “lies cooked up by anti-China forces in the U.S.” The Intel controversy has prompted a comment from the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. And Wang Junkai, a Chinese Intel brand ambassador, announced he was ending his partnership with the chipmaker in light of the controversy. By Wednesday, a hashtag on the event had attracted more than 270 million views on Weibo. Nationalistic Weibo users have swarmed to Intel’s official Weibo account to express their condemnation. Pro-government nationalist news site Guancha.cn accused the chipmaker of committing “the biggest offense to the Chinese market” by citing Western governments’ “vilification of ‘forced labor’" in Xinjiang. Intel, like many American multinationals operating in China, is caught up in a crossfire between the U.S.
![quantum event recorder red status quantum event recorder red status](https://www.centralrwy.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/product-RDU-1.jpg)
Some of the sites appeared to supply other tech companies as well. The company sources parts from all over the world, but Australian researchers last year found four sites in Apple's supply chain that appear to have made use of forced Uyghur labor. border officials "by clear and convincing evidence" that the products weren't made using forced labor - an exacting standard.Īpple had previously lobbied on other versions of the bill in what media reports described as an effort to weaken its provisions. To bring in goods from Xinjiang, companies must convince U.S. The bill bans imports from the region, where Chinese authorities have set up detainment camps. describes as a genocide - and the White House has indicated President Biden will sign it. The House and Senate have both passed the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act - named for the western region's Turkic Muslims, who have been subject to what the U.S. A bill aimed at putting pressure on tech supply chains by making companies prove goods from China’s Xinjiang region weren't produced using forced labor will likely soon become law.